Boeing 777 vs Airbus A350
Side-by-side comparison of the two dominant long-haul wide-body twins: cockpit philosophy, range, payload, fuel burn, maintenance.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Pricing
Boeing 777
List $360M (777-9), used 777-300ER $40-60M
Airbus A350
List $317M (A350-1000), used A350-900 $80-130M
Pros & Cons
Boeing 777
Pros
- +Massive payload — 9,000+ NM range with full pax
- +GE90 / GE9X largest commercial engine
- +Long ULR variants (777-200LR / 777-9)
- +Familiar Boeing yoke/steering
Cons
- –Higher fuel burn vs A350 generation
- –Older airframes (777-200/300 ER) age 15+
- –Less composite use vs A350
Airbus A350
Pros
- +Lighter composite airframe — better fuel burn
- +Sidestick + Airbus FBW philosophy
- +Longer range A350-900ULR (Singapore SIN-EWR)
- +Modern cabin (lower altitude, higher humidity)
Cons
- –Smaller cargo cap vs 777-300ER
- –Earlier engine durability issues (Trent XWB on hot/dusty routes)
Best For
Boeing 777
Long-haul carriers prioritizing payload and ULR (Emirates, Qatar, EVA)
Airbus A350
Carriers prioritizing fuel economics and modern cabin (Lufthansa, SIA, Cathay)
Our Verdict
A350 wins on fuel burn and modern cabin design; 777 wins on payload and proven track record. New deliveries split — most flag carriers operate both for different mission profiles.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is harder to type rate on?
Both are roughly equivalent in difficulty for an experienced narrow-body pilot — typically a 4-6 week course. Boeing pilots may find 777 cockpit philosophy more intuitive; Airbus pilots prefer A350 sidestick layout.
Which has the longer career runway?
Both will be in fleet for 25+ years. A350 is the newer airframe (2013) and currently in active production growth, but 777-9 production runs to 2035+.
Free Practice Test
Test your aviation knowledge with our free 10-question quiz. No signup required.
Take Free Quiz